Speaking of man: life, meaning and role in our existence is always current. Because,
apart from the man himself always at issue, it can also be seen that
any major events happening in the world, whatever the problem to be
solved in our earth, at its core, and finally mesh well with humans. Family
planning seeks to limit and reduce the speed of increase of human,
technological advances mean more stable and the availability of tools
that can facilitate human life, even war even with sophisticated
weaponry is basically the embodiment of confrontational relationships
between people who want fun.
Since centuries people have tried to solve the underlying problems of the meaning and role of its existence, and as the answer sparked all sorts of opinions, which is not only co-exist and complement, but also contradictory. With it was still not satisfied and the person continues to reveal truths about human beings further until now. It should be recognized that the man was not a "probleme" which will run solved, as Gabriel Marcel, but "Mystere" which can not be described completely the nature and characteristics and therefore must be understood and internalized.
Like every human being has a view of life, so there he had a view of man. Thus we can follow throughout history, that there are different kinds of views about human beings, either as a result of reflective thought and prarefleksif. But diversity does not mean that thereby Padangan-anthropological view more steady and thorough. In discussing the history of human thought, ernst Cassirer instead emphasized the human view on the crisis today. Because the diversity of views about human beings, there is no longer a central idea, "1" idee maitresse "to lend Taine term, which reflects the unity of human nature. In empiristis each meredusir human thinkers on the fact factice solely in accordance with the point of view he uses. Thus Freud think of it as sexual instinct, Marx regarded it as economical instinct, the will to power alone.
It can not be denied that in the history of philosophy, the first centuries also showed differences in ideology about human or theories which intersect in the problem, but there are at least a general orientation or framework capable of linking together all the different schools. Neither philosophy, theology, biology or physics, the idea of the essentials of human umm as background or fundamental base, and from there they each direction outlined further investigation.
Real crisis emerging at baseline orientation can provide guidance on each of these areas began to fade. The sociologists. Politicians, biologists, anthropologists and the economy begins to approach the human problem of each discipline as a starting point. No more general idea as the essential core received together. Each thinker run sectoral evaluation and conception, and thus does not seem a common ground between them. Each lives in his own thoughts and speak in technical language itself. No wonder that with such a difficult opening up communication or dialogue between them. This is according to Karl Jaspers in his lecture Wahrheit und Wissenschaft pose a danger of fragmentation, in which man is no longer accepted as personal as they are, but stripped down to be a part of it. A reduction to a mere element factice!
This paper aims to reveal the re-orientation of the people who are the subject before, which should be the starting point for the elaboration and further investigations based on the approach of each discipline, and be able to relate the results of the discovery of these disciplines in the central conception of man. In particular the paper will highlight the human problem: how and where the basic factors which must be considered, so that we can have a picture as precise and as good of mankind. Therefore, here especially to be discussed where and how the context is always behind the man, so he does not diredusir or difragmentir into one element, even essential ones, but instead fully understood properly. We try to show the basic framework that always accompany human and parse them as far as possible to be considered and included in the investigation of human efforts in each of these disciplines, because only with such an attitude that human wholeness can be secured and maintained.
By the term 'fully' intended that this discussion is an attempt to review the human being as a whole, as a totality, and therefore, the problem is not just researching elements or materials that make up the human body, but rather reveals a whole life, the meaning and the meaning of his existence as a person . Mampunyai human biological life, but discussed only in terms of purely biological means a fragmentary study is not possible to unravel the whole, because it basically starts from the fact segregated from other realities overall as unified. To find the necessary understanding of the whole person pouring characteristics and properties that include the human structure, it would have done enough to hold konstatasi facts or human fenomin, compare and collate the facts sebgai sense of unity, but must look to the core essence. So it's not how humans occur, but whether and who he really is. The question of the nature that would not be answered by showing his appearance alone, but through human appearance factice that we tried to express the human ontological. This means a radical reflection, as far as seeing and looking quatalis human existence.
Since centuries people have tried to solve the underlying problems of the meaning and role of its existence, and as the answer sparked all sorts of opinions, which is not only co-exist and complement, but also contradictory. With it was still not satisfied and the person continues to reveal truths about human beings further until now. It should be recognized that the man was not a "probleme" which will run solved, as Gabriel Marcel, but "Mystere" which can not be described completely the nature and characteristics and therefore must be understood and internalized.
Like every human being has a view of life, so there he had a view of man. Thus we can follow throughout history, that there are different kinds of views about human beings, either as a result of reflective thought and prarefleksif. But diversity does not mean that thereby Padangan-anthropological view more steady and thorough. In discussing the history of human thought, ernst Cassirer instead emphasized the human view on the crisis today. Because the diversity of views about human beings, there is no longer a central idea, "1" idee maitresse "to lend Taine term, which reflects the unity of human nature. In empiristis each meredusir human thinkers on the fact factice solely in accordance with the point of view he uses. Thus Freud think of it as sexual instinct, Marx regarded it as economical instinct, the will to power alone.
It can not be denied that in the history of philosophy, the first centuries also showed differences in ideology about human or theories which intersect in the problem, but there are at least a general orientation or framework capable of linking together all the different schools. Neither philosophy, theology, biology or physics, the idea of the essentials of human umm as background or fundamental base, and from there they each direction outlined further investigation.
Real crisis emerging at baseline orientation can provide guidance on each of these areas began to fade. The sociologists. Politicians, biologists, anthropologists and the economy begins to approach the human problem of each discipline as a starting point. No more general idea as the essential core received together. Each thinker run sectoral evaluation and conception, and thus does not seem a common ground between them. Each lives in his own thoughts and speak in technical language itself. No wonder that with such a difficult opening up communication or dialogue between them. This is according to Karl Jaspers in his lecture Wahrheit und Wissenschaft pose a danger of fragmentation, in which man is no longer accepted as personal as they are, but stripped down to be a part of it. A reduction to a mere element factice!
This paper aims to reveal the re-orientation of the people who are the subject before, which should be the starting point for the elaboration and further investigations based on the approach of each discipline, and be able to relate the results of the discovery of these disciplines in the central conception of man. In particular the paper will highlight the human problem: how and where the basic factors which must be considered, so that we can have a picture as precise and as good of mankind. Therefore, here especially to be discussed where and how the context is always behind the man, so he does not diredusir or difragmentir into one element, even essential ones, but instead fully understood properly. We try to show the basic framework that always accompany human and parse them as far as possible to be considered and included in the investigation of human efforts in each of these disciplines, because only with such an attitude that human wholeness can be secured and maintained.
By the term 'fully' intended that this discussion is an attempt to review the human being as a whole, as a totality, and therefore, the problem is not just researching elements or materials that make up the human body, but rather reveals a whole life, the meaning and the meaning of his existence as a person . Mampunyai human biological life, but discussed only in terms of purely biological means a fragmentary study is not possible to unravel the whole, because it basically starts from the fact segregated from other realities overall as unified. To find the necessary understanding of the whole person pouring characteristics and properties that include the human structure, it would have done enough to hold konstatasi facts or human fenomin, compare and collate the facts sebgai sense of unity, but must look to the core essence. So it's not how humans occur, but whether and who he really is. The question of the nature that would not be answered by showing his appearance alone, but through human appearance factice that we tried to express the human ontological. This means a radical reflection, as far as seeing and looking quatalis human existence.
No comments:
Post a Comment